“Mama? Do you have an ass?” ONE smiled at me.
I raised an eyebrow.
“Go fish,” I said. “And it’s an Ace, Pea.”
“Right, an Ace.” She lifted the top card. “I got a Beethoven!”
“Pea, I don’t think…well…let me see that.”
She hesitated and handed me the card. “You don’t get to keep him, do you?”
“I don’t sweetie. And this is a Jack. He does look a little like Beethoven, though. And next time, don’t tell me what card you picked, okay?”
“Okay, Mama! I like this game. I think I’m gonna win again!”
*
As a child, you learn that cheating is bad. That you should never do it. But you also find that you LOVE to win.
This leads to one of childhood’s first moral dilemmas. Around the time you learn all the rules, you learn that winning is waaaaay better than losing. In fact, there’s no such thing as second place.
1st Place=Winner
2nd Place=LOSERVILLE
And none of this happy “everyone’s a winner” shit. Kids aren’t stupid. They know it’s a load of crap. No one likes to be the loser, but it’s important to lose sometimes because that makes winning mean something.
And they lOvE LOVE lOvE winning.
It’s just that sometimes winning requires a little assistance.
A little peek.
A little switch-a-roo.
But as the “adult” you find that cheating at a game is a little more complicated. It’s no longer as simple as wrong. It’s actually a three-part program, complete with moral dilemmas and additional guilt.
Cheating to Build Their Excitement For the Game
Say what you want about the “c” word, you know if the kid loses the first few games, that could be it. And games are important. It’s something to do together as a family and something they can do without you later. (The “later” part is of utmost importance.)
So often, you have to very carefully let them win. This form of cheating is precise and requires more concentration than most adults can usually offer, or have the patience for.
However, when it’s just the two of you, it’s rather easy. Especially because try as they might, very few three-year-olds can fan out the cards in their small hands. You might find it helpful to slide the nearest laundry basket across the floor to give them a little “privacy” while they ponder and plot their next move. (Be sure to check the basket first, though. No matter how old and mature you think you are, there’s still something kinda ick about staring at a mountain of your dad’s jockey’s. I’m sorry, there just is.)
Once the child is confident about the game and can maneuver him/herself without your help, the cheating stops. If for no other reason, it’s boring as hell to lose every game.
Cheating to Make This Blessed Game End
Seriously, how many times can one child get the Mister Mint card when they’ve already passed Princess Frostine? And how many times can the adult get sent back past Gramma Nut? Three, dammit. And for crying out loud, why did they have to make one Chute go from the second-to-last row all the way back to the beginning of the game? There are 100 squares on that board…
Look, I’m not saying it’s a good idea to cheat all the time, but sometimes it’s necessary. Your last few braincells are at stake. And it’s not like you’re trying to win. You don’t care. The game simply must end. If you need to justify it to yourself, just say that the child needs this win to be pleasant. And you need them to be pleasant until your S.O. gets home. Which, according to the clock, is still 4 hours away…
But for the love of all that is good, don’t get caught. At three/four they are still easy to distract. You can slip a Lolly card to the top of the pile, or insist that the spinner got stuck. They are always eager to agree with the Milton Bradley brand of injustice. (Of course this backfires later when they try to do this themselves, but worry about that then.)
“What about a Queen, Mama? Do you have one?”
“Go fish.”
“She looks worried. Why is she worried?”
“Maybe palace life isn’t what she expected.” I said.
“Maybe she needs a King. Can I go fish for a King?”
“Well, you can pick up the next card, but you can’t dig through for the one you want.”
“How about a marshmallow? I think maybe a marshmallow would make her feel better. Does Nanny have any?” She got up and went to the pantry. An ideal time to replace the top card with a Queen. If I were so inclined…
Cheating Because You’re Still Competitive
No, I’ve never cheated my kid out of a game. That would be pathetic.
However, I did cheat that smack-talking 9 year-old I used to babysit.
I defend this behavior without guilt because babysitters are given very little power over their wards. Creative passive-aggressive game playing is an art. The single form of retribution available to most adults. And besides, it was Electronic Battleship. And that game rules.
Of course it’s different with your actual child. I mean, I’m guessing it is. If she starts smack-talking and I can’t beat her honestly, I might have to dig deep into old habits to, you know, teach her a lesson.
“No, Pea. And you don’t either.”
“Yes I do.” She showed me her card.
I recognized my husband’s handwriting immediately, but it took a moment to remember why he drew on the card.
I flipped through the rest of the deck.
It was missing a King of Spades.
I thought about him. How we fell in love over cards. And not just because he let me win from time to time, either. (Although that helped.) There just wasn’t much to do in the winter when we were college-poor and spending Christmas break at my parents’ house.
So we played cards. Lots and lots of cards.
This led to the moral dilemmas. Am I teaching her to cheat on life? On family? Am I opening the gateway to serious cheating later? And why does parenting lend itself so completely to obsessing?
Time to do what a guilt-ridden mother does best: overcompensate with too much truth on a completely different subject as soon as it presents itself.
“Mama, do you have an ass?”
“No Pea, I don’t. And chances are, when you grow up and have kids, you won’t either.”
Tags: cards, children, go fish, grandparents, love, memories

November 12, 2008 at 11:26 am |
Hilarious! Possibly my favorite blog to date (have I said that before?? Because as writing I felt I might have…don’t let that degrade it…it’s sincere.)
November 12, 2008 at 11:37 am |
Cheating is wrong. Vote Quimby…
November 12, 2008 at 11:38 am |
Great stuff, I love you more each day!
November 12, 2008 at 1:33 pm |
You need to “go fish” my icky drawers out of that basket and stop airing my dirty laundry in public.
BTW, they’re Merona boxers fresh from Target, and they’re not icky. How dare you.
The only Jockeys I know of is the one that rides that butt-hurting King of Horses card. Why is he wearing a jester’s crown? And that spade looks more like an arrow pointing to perhaps the weakest installment to art history every recorded. Pathetic.
Love you,
Me
November 12, 2008 at 1:59 pm |
Dear That Girl’s Trifling Father,
As you know, that story took place last weekend in Jersey. At my parents’ house. And as a refresher, you, your silly-ass boxers and TWO stayed behind in VA. So I was referring to myself getting a little ill at the sight of my father’s…you know…underwear.
And as the person who actually purchases your undergarments, I know you don’t wear Jockeys.
I wouldn’t have married you if you did.
Love you too,
Staff
November 12, 2008 at 4:28 pm |
Feeling the boxer-related love. Good times.
November 12, 2008 at 5:56 pm |
I second Evenshine. How adorable, an online underwear squable.
But as for the post, it really does reming me that Evan should branch out from the Memory game. ONE is so cute.
November 12, 2008 at 11:35 pm |
You totally reminded me of Glengarry Glen Ross just now (“Second place is…YOU’RE FIRED!”).
And I, too, have cheated so that my son could win. And let me tell you, it was hard because we were playing Candyland and the only way I could keep from beating him was to precheck the cards and make sure he got doubles and I got the peanut. I don’t know…is it wrong to cheat if you aren’t cheating to WIN?
November 14, 2008 at 10:04 am |
This was a great post. Cute story and the “unspeakables” banter in comments was quite amusing as well.